Clinical and evolutive characteristics of patients rehabilitated with ocular prosthesis

Authors

Keywords:

artificial eye, ocular secretions, eye defects, oral maxillofacial rehabilitation.

Abstract

Introduction: Ocular prosthesis is an artificial means with functional and cosmetic ends that facilitates the physical, psychic and social rehabilitation of patients with eyes defects.

Objective: To describe the evolution of patients with ocular prosthesis according to infection signs in the rehabilitated ocular cavities, associated risk factors, as well as modifications in the form of the cavity and/or in the ocular prosthesis 

Methods: An observational, longitudinal and prospective study of 74 patients suffering from eye defects that received prosthetist treatment from 2018 to 2019 in the oral maxillofacial Rehabilitation Clinic was carried out in Santiago de Cuba, who were evaluated through a survey and a clinical exam in three moments during a year of evolution. To establish the association between variables, the Pearson chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used with the fulfillment of suppositions. 

Results: Of the 222 exams made to the rehabilitated ocular cavities, 31 revealed the presence of secretions in 23 patients, with recurrence in 8 of them; this clinical sign became evident in a similar way to the hypercoloring of the conjunctiva  as for the moment of the finding and  the age group affected, with higher percentages at the year of evolution and a higher incidence in the patients of 60 years and over. Also, an association statistically significant of the daily hygiene of the cavity and prosthesis variables with the existence of secretions was verified, for a confidence interval of 95 %.

Conclusions: The advantage of the ocular cavity and prosthesis weekly personal cleanliness was demonstrated, because with it the frequency of the inflammatory and infectious signs of the mucous is reduced, what should be strictly observed in elderly, who are the most affected. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Kumari J, Verma A, Shankar D, Chatterjee U, Ranjan M. Ocular prosthesis- fabrication and microbial assessment. IOSR-JDMS. 2020 [citado 11/11/2020];19(7):40-5. Disponible en: https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jdms/papers/Vol19-issue7/Series-12/H1907124045.pdf

2. Lalaleo Yuccha DP, Silva León KJ. Las prótesis oculares como alternativa para la reinserción social por parte de los profesionales de la salud visual del cantón Babahoyo [tesis de grado]. Cantón Babahoyo: Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo; 2019.

3. Coelho Goiato M, Pereira de Caixas F, Dos Santos DM. Quality of life living with ocular prosthesis. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2018 [citado 16/06/2019];13(4):187-9. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17469899.2018.1503534

4. López Ángeles RE. Patógenos en la cavidad anoftálmica en portadores de prótesis ocular [tesis de especialidad]. México: Universidad Autónoma de México; 2017 [citado 23/04/2021]. Disponible en: http://www.odonto.unam.mx/sites/default/files/inline-files/516001210.pdf

5. Hatamleh MM, Abbariki M, Alqudah N, Cook AE. Survery of Ocular Prosthetics Rehabilitation in the United Kingdom, part 1: Anophthalmic Patients' Aetiology, Opinions and Attitudes. J Craniofac Surg. 2017 [citado 14/09/2018];28(5):1293-6. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003370

6. Kumar R, Raizada K. Measurement of fornix depth: a novel method of determining the severity of fornix in anophthalmic socket. Int J Res Anal Rev. 2019;6(3):81-8.

7. Shankar Chaudhary R, Nath Dahal H, Kaitiand R, Shrestha B. Profile of Custom Ocular Prosthesis Users in a Tertiary Eye Care Centre in Nepal. J Ophthalmol Clin Res. 2020 [citado 08/01/2021];4(3). Disponible en: https://opastonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/profile-of-custom-ocular-prosthesis-users-in-a-tertiary-eye-care-centre-in-nepal-jocr-20.pdf

8. Ramírez García LK, Martínez Portuondo AI, Gómez Cabrera CG, Díaz Azze M, Rojas Rondón I, Carrazana Pérez Y. Afecciones de la conjuntiva en pacientes con prótesis ocular. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2014 [citado 23/04/2019];27(3). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21762014000300007

9. Echeverry Caicedo LJ. Alternativa para la rehabilitación de cavidades anoftálmicas no candidatas a cirugía, el método del expansor orbitario en el Hospital Universitario de la Samaritana, Nivel 3 de referencia en la ciudad de Bogotá, Colombia [tesis]. Chía: Universidad de La Sabana; 2016 [citado 23/04/2019]. Disponible en: https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10818/22995/Laura%20Jimena%20Echeverry%20Caicedo%20%28tesis%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=

10. Martínez Álvarez B. Anoftalmía y microftalmía congénitas. Prótesis oculares. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla; 2019 [citado 23/04/2019]. Disponible en: https://idus.us.es/bitstream/handle/11441/91805/MART%C3%8DNEZ%20%C3%81LVAREZ%2C%20BEL%C3%89N.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

11. Durmaz Engin C, Baran Ekinci U, Selver A, Osman Saatci A. Efficacy of Topical Brinzolamide Treatment in Posterior Microphthalmos-Related Macular Cystoid Lesions: A case series. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2020 [citado 10/05/2020];50(1):44–9. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7086100/

12. Morilla Guzmán AA, Rabaza Pérez J, Blanco González ZA. Importancia de la neuroimagen en la anoftalmia congénita neonatal: a propósito de un caso. Rev Haban Cienc Méd. 2018 [citado 13/02/2019];17(5):837-46. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/revhabciemed/hcm-2018/hcm185q.pdf

13. Vizzuelt Lópes IV. Reconstrucción de cavidad anoftálmica con injerto cutáneo en pacientes enucleados por retino-blastoma. México, D.F.: Instituto Nacional de Pediatría; 2002

14. Padilla García EG, Ardito R, Arellano Valenzuela A, Medina A, Vera Torres AM, Graue Moreno G. Consenso de la sociedad Iberoamericana oculoplástica para la selección del implante ideal en la cavidad anoftálmica. Rev Méx Oftalmol. 2020 [citado 02/12/2020];94(1):5-8. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S2604-12272020000100005&script=sci_arttext&tlng=es

15. Carrazana Pérez YM, Ramírez García LK, Rojas Rondón I, Gómez Cabrera C, Cárdenas Pérez FY, Trujillo Fonseca KM. Cavidades anoftálmicas atípicas en el Instituto Cubano de Oftalmología "Ramón Pando Ferrer". Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2014 [citado 08/01/2021];27(2):180-8. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/revcuboft/rco-2014/rco142c.pdf

16. Jyotsna Vimal, Virendra Singh, Sunit Kumar Jurel, Raghuwar Dayal Singh, Pooran Chand. Prosthetic management of large ocular defect using lost salt technique – Case report. International Dental Journal of Student Research. 2020 [citado 17/04/2021];8(3):122–4. Disponible en: https://www.ipinnovative.com/media/journals/IntDentJStudRes-8-3-122-124.pdf

Published

2021-12-06

How to Cite

1.
Vinent Céspedes AM, Martí Pool M, Céspedes Quevedo MC. Clinical and evolutive characteristics of patients rehabilitated with ocular prosthesis. MEDISAN [Internet]. 2021 Dec. 6 [cited 2025 Jun. 2];25(6):1378-93. Available from: https://medisan.sld.cu/index.php/san/article/view/3852

Issue

Section

Original Articles